DIY HALLOWEEN 2026 e-MEETING, POST 4 of 4 – Aurora 13, Answers to Quiz

This is our closing post of the afternoon.

At this moment, the club is wrapping up its annual Super Sci-Fi Book Sale at our downtown meeting locale. As such, there is no interactive ZOOM-chat component included with this month’s MonSFFA event.

But for our out-of-town club members and friends, we do offer today, here online, a few Halloween-themed items of interest, culled from our meeting archives of these past few years.

The Horror, The Horror…

For your perusal, then, this overview of Aurora’s line of movie monster-themed plastic model kits, and the mania they precipitated in the 1960s, followed by the answers to theHalloween Quiz we put up in our opening post earlier this afternoon:

Any so-called “Monster Kid” growing up in the 1960s harboured two utmost desires: the latest issue of Famous Monsters of Filmland magazine (co-founded by pioneering sci-fi fan Forrest J Ackerman), and the latest release in Aurora’s line of classic monster model kits!

The Long Island, NY-based Aurora Plastics Corporation was founded in 1950 as a contract manufacturer of injection-molded plastics. Before too long, the company began producing and marketing its own line of “all plastic assembly kits” for young hobbyists, focusing chiefly on aircraft and automobiles.

Aurora’s first figure kits, a set of medieval knights in armour, were introduced in the mid-’50s, quickly followed by the “Guys and Gals of All Nations” series, featuring statuettes dressed in the national costumes of Holland, China, Scotland, and other countries, this in an effort to appeal to female crafters. Throughout the late-’50s, ’60s, and ’70s, other historical subjects followed the knights, from Roman gladiators to modern U.S. soldiers, sailors, and airmen, along with a variety of kits spotlighting American wildlife, sports stars, comic book superheroes, sci-fi TV characters, and the prehistoric world.

But it was a licensing agreement with Universal Studios that allowed Aurora to launch what would become its most popular and successful series of all, the Movie Monster Models collection!

Universal’s classic horror films were enjoying a revival in the late-’50s- and early-’60s, and were all the rage with youngsters, who flocked to movie houses to see them, or watched them on television, where they aired frequently. Aurora marketing director Bill Silverstein had taken note of the appeal these old pictures had with adolescents and teens, and pitched the idea of a series of kits showcasing Universal’s stable of venerable movie monsters. He was met with ridicule and disinterest but persisted and eventually convinced skeptical upper management to gauge interest by bringing to market one model.

That model was Frankenstein, released in 1961. Silverstein was quickly vindicated! Frankenstein was an instant hit and calls started coming in to Aurora’s sales offices requesting other kits in the line. Dracula and The Wolf Man were rushed into production and were on store shelves in time for Christmas 1962.

The Creature (from the Black Lagoon), The Mummy, The Phantom of the Opera, Dr. Jekyll as Mr. Hyde, non-Universal behemoths King Kong and Godzilla, and others followed. There were 13 monster kits produced in all—tagged by aficionados “The Aurora 13”—plus two customizing kits and a Gigantic Frankenstein, the finished model standing some two-feet tall.  A pair of affiliated models, the Munsters ’65 and the Addams Family Haunted House, are often considered part of the series.

The Hunchback’s box art was modified several times. Actor Anthony Quinn’s face was painted over to arrive at a more generic visage, and later given the Glows-in-the-Dark treatment!

Advertised in Famous Monsters of Filmland and DC Comics publications, Aurora’s monster kits skyrocketed in popularity. In 1964, a U.S.-wide Monster Customizing Contest was sponsored in cooperation with Universal Pictures and Famous Monsters, contributing to a growing “Monster Mania.”

Young model-makers were tasked with creating a macabre diorama using any combination of Aurora monster kits and customizing materials. Two customizing kits were issued, providing modellers with an assortment of skulls, spiders, rats, and such with which to enhance their miniature tableaus. Each entrant received a “Master Monster Maker” certificate. Hundreds of prizes were handed out with the national winner awarded a paid trip to Hollywood and the opportunity to appear in a horror movie!

Sculptor Bill Lemon was responsible for designing and producing the patterns for most of the monster models, with Ray Meyers and Adam “Larry” Ehling taking over when Lemon left to pursue other commissions. The Forgotten Prisoner of Castel-Mare was the last kit in the line, becoming available in 1967-’68 and sporting box art by renowned pulp illustrator Mort Künstler.

It was the box art produced by James Bama, however, that indelibly marked Aurora’s Movie Monster Models. At the time, Bama was working as a commercial artist for a major New York advertising firm. He was known as a prolific paperback and magazine cover artist, as well as for dramatic interior illustrations featured in men’s adventure magazines. Genre fans would soon come to know him for his extraordinarily striking monochromatic Doc Savage covers for Bantam Books’ paperback reprints of the original novels.

The accomplished illustrator applied his signature realism to what was fantastical subject matter in rendering melodramatically lit, vividly colourful box art for the monster kits. Save for Künstler’s single contribution, Bama produced all of the original box art for the series, as well as a few pieces for spin-offs like the Monstermobiles line, which put our favourite monsters in crazily-exaggerated hot-rods, a concept that did not fly with either monster or hot-rod enthusiasts.

Beginning in 1969, the original monster models were modified to include luminescent parts and reissued through the early-’70s with reworked packaging that included some new art by artist Harry Schaare, who essentially copied Bama’s originals while highlighting with bright acrylics the glow-in-the-dark components of the model. In some instances, Bama’s original gouache paintings were actually painted over with acrylics—no one present back in the day seems to know who might have been responsible for that sin, or perhaps nobody wants to say!

In 1971, Aurora launched its controversial Monster Scenes line, featuring four character kits: Frankenstein, sexy comic book pin-up Vampirella, the sadistic Doctor Deadly, and a scantily-clad young woman dubbed simply “The Victim.” At about 1/13 scale, these simple, snap-together, toy-like figures were smaller and lacked the detail of their movie monster cousins. The concept, here, was to enable children to easily assemble and then play with the models. Each figure came with extra sets of movable arms and legs so that they could be assembled in different poses.

In addition to the character kits, four “grisly equipment” kits with names like Gruesome Goodies and The Pain Parlour were available, together serving as a torture-chamber playset into which the figures could be placed. Aurora played up the lurid horror, violence, and sex, promoting its new line with the slogan “Rated ‘X’ for excitement!”

It wasn’t long before concerned parents were petitioning Nabisco, owners of Aurora at the time, outraged at these “sick toys” that make for a “sick society!” Women’s groups, too, admonished the company for promoting misogynistic cruelty, noting that the helpless “Victim” didn’t even rate her own name!

Nervous Nabisco quickly ordered a halt to the tooling on two new kits, a dungeon and an animal pit into which The Victim could be lowered, and announced that the Monster Scenes line was to be discontinued. Preliminary development on models of a second victim, an executioner, and more torture devices ceased. All remaining inventory, including three as yet unreleased kits—Dracula, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, and The Giant Insect—were shipped to Canada, where The Victim was recast as Dr. Deadly’s Daughter.

The following year, Aurora recovered from this costly debacle, premiering its well-received Prehistoric Scenes line, which incorporated the same models-as-toys idea that had underpinned the short-lived Monster Scenes series.

Aurora’s swansong monster series was the 1/12-scale Monsters of the Movies line. But by now the monster craze had passed and the last kit in this series was shipped in 1977. The company shut down its molding machines that same year.

In a span of just 27 years, Aurora had progressed from humble beginnings to become one of the foremost and most innovative producers of scale-model kits in the industry, only to fall victim to a number of questionable marketing moves and product choices, as well as generally waning public interest in the hobby.

Bill Silverstein remained focused on the business of marketing toys. His stint at Aurora led him to join comic actors Don “Maxwell Smart” Adams and Bill “José Jiménez” Dana in forming a small advertising agency, securing Aurora as a client, of course! In the early-’70s, he became a partner at Helfgott & Partners (later Helfgott, Towne & Silverstein), a high-profile New York agency that represented the Ideal Toy Company.

After leaving Aurora, Bill Lemon went on to sculpt for major toy manufacturers like Remco and Marx and produced, over his decades-long career, everything from anatomical models for medical schools to Pez dispensers to a circa-1980s Michael Jackson doll.

James Bama left New York in 1968 and moved to Wyoming, where he established himself as a painter specializing in Western themes. In recognition of his Aurora box art, he was inducted into the Monster Kid Hall of Fame in 2006.

Rival model manufacturer Monogram (later merged with another rival, Revell) initially acquired many of Aurora’s molds from parent company Nabisco and reissued a number of the kits under its own banner beginning in the late-’70s. In the mid-’90s and more recently, modern scale-model manufacturers like Polar Lights and Moebius Models have retooled, updated, and rereleased many of Aurora’s most popular kits, occasioning a revival of Monster Mania for both aging Monster Kids and a new generation.

ANSWERS TO…

And finally, here are the answers to the quiz we posted earlier this afternoon:

1) Halloween is the day before which holiday? – All Saints (Hallows) Day

2) The tradition of making Jack-o-Lanterns to ward off evil spirits is thousands of years old. Which vegetable were they originally made out of? – Turnips

3) According to superstition, if you stare into a mirror at midnight on Halloween, what will you see? – Your future husband or wife.

4) From which region in the world do pumpkins originate? – Central America

5) Who wrote the novel Frankenstein? – Mary Shelley

6) Transylvania is a region in which country? – Romania

7) Halloween has its origins in which ancient Celtic festival? – Samhain

8) Which actor played Dr. Frank-n-Furter in The Rocky Horror Picture Show? – Tim Curry

9) Is a pumpkin a fruit or vegetable? – Fruit

10) What is the significance of seeing a spider on Halloween? – It is thought to be the spirit of a loved one watching over the person who finds the spider.

11) Which country celebrates the Day of the Dead starting at midnight on October 31? – Mexico

12) According to superstition, a person born on Halloween has what particular ability? – The ability to see and talk to spirits.

13) Who directed The Nightmare Before Christmas? – Henry Selick

14) “Don’t be afraid. I’m going to give you the choice I never had.” Which vampire spoke these words? – Lestat (Interview with the Vampire)

15) How many people were hanged during the Salem Witch Trials?    – 19

16) Every Halloween, Charlie Brown helps his friend Linus wait for what character to appear? – The Great Pumpkin

17) What do people “bob” for on Halloween? – Apples

18) Who is said to haunt the White House Rose Garden? – First Lady Dolly Madison

19) Pumpkins can be orange, white, green, or what other colour?        – Blue

20) In the The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, how many people are killed with a chainsaw? – One

21) What’s the body-count in the film Halloween? – Five people, one dog.

22) In which year was the movie Freaks made? – 1932

23) In the original Alien film, how many alien eggs were made for the egg chamber inside the downed spacecraft? – 130

24) How many Oscar nominations did Psycho receive? – Four, including Best Director (Alfred Hitchcock) and Best Supporting Actress (Janet Leigh); the film did not win in any of the categories for which it was nominated.

THANK YOU!

We hope you have enjoyed this afternoon’s Halloween-themed posts. SF/F fans are welcome and encouraged to join the fun, and join MonSFFA! If you have questions about the club, allow us to take you to our leader: president@monsffa.ca

The club meets next on Saturday, November 14, 2026 from 1:00PM to 5:00PM at the Nouvel Hotel, 1740 René-Lévesque Ouest, downtown.

Until then, consider the sincerity of the pumpkin patch pictured here, save some of those Halloween treats for the kids, and thrill to all the horror movies airing and streaming this month!

Farewell, sleep tight, and don’t let the vampires bite!

DIY HALLOWEEN 2026 e-MEETING, POST 3 of 4 – Horror 101: How to Scare Readers and Audiences

This is Post 3 of 4.

At this moment, the club is holding its annual Super Sci-Fi Book Sale at our downtown meeting locale. As such, there is no interactive ZOOM-chat component included with this month’s MonSFFA event.

But for our out-of-town club members and friends, we do offer today, here online, a few Halloween-themed items of interest, culled from our meeting archives of these past few years.

The Horror, The Horror…

For your perusal, then, we offer this dissertation on how the professionals scare their readers and audiences:

HORROR 101: HOW WRITERS AND FILMMAKERS SCARE THEIR READERS AND AUDIENCES

The oldest and strongest emotion of mankind is fear, and the oldest and strongest kind of fear is fear of the unknown.—H. P. Lovecraft (1890-1937), “Supernatural Horror in Literature” (essay, 1927; revised 1933-1934)

THE HORROR GENRE: SEVERAL DEFINITIONS

Let us begin by presenting a few definitions of horror offered by various scholars and/or practitioners of the genre, and one local fan:

Horror is a genre of fiction that is intended to disturb, frighten, or scare.—Philosopher and author Noël Carroll (born 1947), The Philosophy of Horror, or, Paradoxes of the Heart (1990)

A piece of fiction in prose of variable length…which shocks, or even frightens the reader, or perhaps induces a feeling of repulsion or loathing.—Literary historian J. A. Cuddon (1928-1996), of the horror story in his introduction to The Penguin Book of Horror Stories (1985)

In the simplest sense, a horror story is one that scares us…and the true horror story requires a sense of evil, not necessarily in a theological sense; but the menaces must be truly menacing, life-destroying, and antithetical to happiness.—Speculative fiction writer Darrell Schweitzer (born 1952), Windows of the Imagination: Essays on Fantastic Literature (1999)

Horror is fully a literary and screen genre expressly calculated to provoke uneasiness, revulsion, fear, and when well executed, terror. Horror’s tales of the supernatural, sometimes termed Gothic Fantasy, or dark fantasy, are intrinsically tied to the larger fantasy genre, while non-supernatural horror, more precisely described as psychological horror, habitually overlaps with mystery, detective, and crime fiction, and is frequently presented within the framework of a thriller. Horror seeks to create an eerie and frightening atmosphere, and shock the reader or viewer. Often, the key peril of a work of horror fiction can be interpreted as a metaphor for the larger anxieties of society.—Keith Braithwaite (born 1958), speaking at the October 14, 2023 meeting of the Montreal Science Fiction and Fantasy Association

The best horror fiction can and does comment on the human condition. The best is more than just the gush of blood and the quick shriek.—Author Robert R. McCammon (born 1952), who notes that elements of horror are often present in other genres, as well as in more mainstream fiction, citing Charles Dickens’ A Christmas Carol as an example. We will jump in, here, to offer, too, as a cinematic example in the same vein, the classic Holiday film It’s a Wonderful Life (1946), which includes a chilling alternate history sequence.

But bestselling horror author Stephen King (born 1947), who knows a thing or two about scary stories, is not particularly interested in definitions.

“It’s a trap, this matter of definition, and I can’t think of a more boring academic subject,” he states. Defining horror “is really a discussion of how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, and not really interesting unless those involved in the discussion are drunk or graduate students—two states of roughly similar incompetence.”

Fair enough. Suffice it to say that horror fiction scares us!

THE ALLURE OF HORROR: WHY ARE WE DRAWN TO IT?

Horror provides civilized man with the pulse-pounding thrill of facing dangers that most of us never have or will encounter, the fear of which, nonetheless, remain forever lodged deep within our collective psyche, a remnant of our species at its most primal. Horror is the rollercoaster ride willingly taken, knowing all along that we’ll survive and emerge unscathed. It’s the safe scare.

Reading horror fiction or watching horror movies allows us to confront our most deeply-seated fears without actually having to do so. It is an experience sought after for the sheer exhilaration of it; for the goosebumps, the hair-raising chill, accelerated breathing, racing heartbeat, the release of endorphins and an audible scream.

Writer Elizabeth Barrette (year of birth unavailable), in her essay “Elements of Aversion” (Creatio ex Nihilo, April-May 1997), has this to say on the topic:

The old “fight or flight” reaction of our evolutionary heritage once played a major role in the life of every human. Our ancestors lived and died by it. Then someone invented the fascinating game of civilization, and things began to calm down. Development pushed wilderness back from settled lands. War, crime, and other forms of social violence came with civilization and humans started preying on each other, but by and large daily life calmed down. We began to feel restless, to feel something missing: the excitement of living on the edge, the tension between hunter and hunted.

So we told each other stories through the long, dark nights. Sometimes we told happy stories, or sacred stories … but when the fires burned low, we did our best to scare the daylights out of each other. The rush of adrenaline feels good. Our hearts pound, our breath quickens, and we can imagine ourselves on the edge. Yet we also appreciate the insightful aspects of horror. Sometimes a story intends to shock and disgust, but the best horror intends to rattle our cages and shake us out of our complacency. It makes us think, forces us to confront ideas we might rather ignore, and challenges preconceptions of all kinds. Horror reminds us that the world is not always as safe as it seems, which exercises our mental muscles and reminds us to keep a little healthy caution close at hand.

STEPHEN KING’S THREE LEVELS OF HORROR

In, Danse Macabre (1981), Stephen King’s treatise on the genre, he lists three levels of Horror.

Terror is top-most, the premium level to which a horror writer or filmmaker should aspire, those delectably suspenseful moments leading up to the instant of violence, or a climactic reveal. Horror is the intermediate level, employed for shock value, presenting us with an alarming image—the monster!—whether in our mind’s eye or on screen. And Revulsion is bottom-level stuff, the cheap gimmick, vile and disgusting, meant to induce a gag-reflex.

Confesses King, “I recognize terror as the finest emotion and so I will try to terrorize the reader. But if I find that I cannot terrify, I will try to horrify, and if I find that I cannot horrify, I’ll go for the gross-out. I’m not proud.”

Proffering examples, and advice from genre professionals, we will explore these, and augment King’s list with a few entries of our own as we learn how horror writers and filmmakers manufacture the scares!

Let’s begin with…

SETTING:

An eerily sinister old castle, a decaying Victorian mansion, the deep, dark woods—perhaps to the point of cliché, these are the archetypal settings of a traditional horror story, replete as they are with the time-honoured trappings of the genre.

The castle—an imposing structure, parapets topping stout, stone walls enclosing the cavernous chambers within, wanly illuminated by flickering torchlight.

The mansion—dusty, dilapidated furniture resting in hoary obsolescence, blanketed in cobwebs and bounded by the tattered drapes that hang in each antiquated room, along with ancient portraits of the house’s former occupants, long-deceased.

The woods—a dense, wicked growth of black, witch-cursed forest.

Whether set in such familiar territory, or in a contemporary, nondescript small town, a family home, a roadside motel that has seen better days, a remote farm, a notorious summer camp, aboard a modern airliner, or travelling the vast cosmos to other worlds in a spaceship, by employing evocative prose—words that conjure up feelings of dreariness, misery, and thoughts of death—the writer may plant in the subconscious mind of the reader a sense of gloominess, of unease, or of impending danger and demise.

“The old house stood alone atop the hill, a stark grey against the afternoon’s pale sky,” might be more effective as “The archaic house stood a stark, ghostly grey against the afternoon’s melancholy sky, like a solitary gravestone atop a cemetery hill.”

Similarly, a filmmaker may use unconventional camera angles—low, long, askew—or exploit the power of editing—a lingering shot, cut-away, or slow dissolve—to obliquely educe the same mood.

ATMOSPHERE:

As atmosphere for a horror story, a dark and stormy night—as hackneyed as it may sound—is generally preferable to a bright, sunny day. Not that a skilled practitioner of the craft cannot wring dread out of a bright, sunny day!

MonSFFA president and horror fan Keith Braithwaite watched a lot of sci-fi, fantasy, and adventure films as a youngster, and one of the most unnerving moments he remembers unfolds on a sun-washed Mediterranean island. Keith got goosebumps as the colossal bronze statue of Talos awakened in the fantasy/adventure film Jason and the Argonauts (1963), sluggishly turning his head with a juddering metallic screech to lock eyes on the two Greek sailors who had, just moments before, been plundering a forbidden treasure stored within the statue’s massive stone pedestal. When, incredibly, the towering Talos stepped down off his platform and began pursuing the men, Keith recalls that his heart was racing!

Viewing that sequence in retrospect, we can only admire the expertise with which it was put together—the suspenseful editing, the metal-twisting sound effect, the ominous musical score, and the slow but steady pursuit of the men by the indomitable giant all came together to deliver a good scare, in broad daylight, no less, and in what isn’t even a proper horror movie!

But as a rule, it’s usually the somber darkness of night, or the shroud of a thick fog reaching across a shadowy moor, or a thick and tangled forest that deliver atmosphere in spades.

Consider a thunderstorm, advised seasoned horror writer and editor Charles L. Grant (1942-2006). The sky begins to darken, clouds roll in, distant thunder can be heard and lightning flashes on the horizon. “You can feel the storm coming, and there’s nothing you can do about it.” The weather advances, slowly, inexorably. And you out in the open without your raincoat or an umbrella; you are going to get wet!

Grant offers that a writer wants his or her reader to experience that kind of tension in order to ultimately deliver the chills. “If all hell breaks loose right away, what’s left?” he asked rhetorically.

Atmosphere, whether meteorological or metaphorical, sets the appropriate tone.

CHARACTERS:

As with any story in any genre, well-crafted protagonists are of principal importance. Good characters are essential to a good story.

The simple truth of it, says bestselling author Dean Koontz (born 1945), is that the reader must readily identify with and care about the lead characters. Noted Charles L. Grant, “If a character is odious, who cares what’s waiting for him up in the attic?”

To wit, we sympathize with shy, mousy, insecure high school girl Carrie White. We welcome the empathy and kindness of classmate Sue Snell, who felt remorse at having initially taunted Carrie. But we care not for the fate of vain, self-centered bully Christine “Chris” Hargensen and her mean-spirited friends.

Given what Carrie has experienced—the girl’s character arc takes her from victim to vengeance—we understand and even cheer her exacting revenge on her tormentors. And, we are pleased to see that Sue survives and uses the “Black Prom” incident to shine a light on high school bullying.

“Good dark fantasy grows out of the fears of the characters,” Grant further declared. “The story dictates where the chills and shocks will be; the people dictate what the story will be. Work on the people and the shadows will do the rest.”

Koontz, meanwhile, outlines five errors of characterization that inhibit a reader’s developing of sympathy for a lead character:

1) The lead character must not act irrationally or so stupidly as to get him/herself in trouble as a result. If he/she moves the family into a house that turns out to be haunted and weird shit starts happening, the protagonist gets out of the house. No reasonable person would stay, and the reader will have little sympathy for anyone who does. In order to keep the family in the house, some convincing reason must exist.

2) The character must not remain passive. He/she must take logical action to deal with the antagonists—human or otherwise—which plague him/her. Hiding in a corner…hoping the bogeyman will go away doesn’t cut it with readers. No one likes a wimp.

3) On the other hand, your characters must not be supermen/superwomen whose actions always result in success. This removes any possibility of suspense.

4) Characters must have lives outside of the central story. They should have a past that shaped them, perhaps equipping them to deal with the immediate situation. A character with personal demons to fight, as well as an actual demon, is a well-rounded character rather than one of the cardboard variety who engenders little sympathy from readers.

5) A character must not be concerned solely with his/her own survival when others are facing the same dangers. He/she must have sympathy for a fellow character—a sibling, son or daughter, girlfriend, etc.—and be willing to put him/herself in harm’s way to help that fellow character. A protagonist who abandons others to their fate while saving him/herself is not a character readers will warm up to.

THE MOMENT OF DISQUIET:

This is the moment in a narrative when the reader or viewer, and often the protagonists, as well, first notice that something is a little off, a bit odd, not quite right. It’s nothing overt, not a signal of any immediate threat, but it’s just enough to raise one’s hackles ever so slightly, and to put one on guard.

It’s the moment when the dog sniffs the air and starts barking at the darkness out beyond the front porch. It’s the pause the hikers take while trekking across the lowlands to remark on an uncharacteristic silence as they realize that even the insects have ceased their ubiquitous chirping and buzzing. It’s when the phone line has gone dead at the isolated cabin-in-the-woods.

The Moment of Disquiet serves to offer an early inkling of looming danger, and foreshadows the deadly threat to come.

THE MOMENT OF VIOLENCE:

This is, quite simply, the moment when the antagonist of the piece commits an act of aggression. It’s the split-second that sees the fiendish vampire quickly lunge at his comely young prey, sharp fangs savagely mauling her delicate neck! It’s the instant that the axe-wielding serial killer launches his assault on the hapless teenagers frolicking on the beach! It’s when the giant, carnivorous insects overrun the small, Southern-California town, feeding on the citizenry; or when the unrelenting zombie horde surrounds the post-apocalyptic survivors, inexorably closing in; or when the ferocious space monster ambushes the woefully unprepared astronaut-explorers!

REVULSION:

The lowest of Stephen King’s three levels of horror is Revulsion—the gross-out, the grotesque, the especially gruesome and gory! He gives the example of Regan projectile-vomiting in father Karras’ face in The Exorcist (1973). We’ll add another example: the bloodletting of victims in the Hostel movies (2005, 2007, 2011)!

Although there are notable exceptions, Splatter films—more recently termed “Torture Porn” or “Gorno”—like Herschell Gordon Lewis’ seminal Blood Feast (1963), as well as his subsequent Two Thousand Maniacs! (1964) and Color Me Blood Red (1965), traffic in revulsion, frequently tinged with sex.

So too the excessively gruesome mockumentary Cannibal Holocaust (1980), presaging The Blair Witch Project (1999), along with a plethora of Slasher flicks pitting, usually, teenagers against a crazed, homicidal stalker relentlessly in pursuit.

Movie-goers are presented with little more than explicit depictions of vicious assaults, flesh-rending cruelty, torturous murder, and blood-soaked dismemberment! The goal is to assail audiences with the most unabashedly brutal violations and killings possible using the biggest, sharpest blades, or any of a variety of implements sickeningly repurposed as weapons.

But when such graphic violence becomes so exaggerated, so over-the-top as to become ludicrous and even comedic—Peter Jackson’s Braindead (1992), Idle Hands (1999), Stan Against Evil (2016-2018), chapters of the Evil Dead franchise (1981-2023)—the term “Splatstick” is applied.

Body Horror, too, highlights the bloody, the stomach-turning, and the repulsive. Canadian director David Cronenberg is widely considered a virtuoso of this sub-genre; his Shivers (1975) and Rabid (1977) are prime examples of oozing, gut-wrenching, parasitic and mutated corruptions of the body.

Based on the George Langelaan sci-fi/horror short story of the same name, The Fly (1958) is a cinematic precursor to the Body Horror films of the 1970s and 1980s, and Cronenberg’s 1986 remake fully embraces the form.

Franz Kafka’s novella Die Verwandlung (in English, Metamorphosis; 1915), in which a man inexplicably transforms into a giant insect, is an example of Body Horror before it was so labelled. Other literary examples date back even further; Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, for instance.

A manipulation of our natural fight-or-flight reflexes—we gasp, retch, flail, scream, look away, run away—Splatter, Slasher, and Body Horror are the genre at its most visceral. Readers and viewers, however, are not so much terrified by this fare as they are revolted. It’s a cheap scare, a tawdry trick dependent upon our involuntary gut reaction to the graphic, bilious, repugnant carnage laid before us rather than on the far more enduring terror our own imaginations can awaken when we are skillfully prompted to contemplate our most profound fears.

THE LEWTON BUS (JUMP–SCARE):

The audience watches intently as a character slowly, cautiously, nervously advances down a dimly lit hallway, baseball bat in hand, raised, ready to swing, fearing that an intruder may have entered the house.

Suddenly, a flurry of sound and motion!

The family cat has jumped out from behind a cabinet, knocking over and shattering a vase.

Movie-goers inevitably jump back in their seats, catching their breath, some letting out a squeal! This is a Jump-Scare, or Pop-Out, the cinematic technique of introducing, without warning, out of the blue, a surprising distraction to either abruptly relieve accumulated tension, or introduce to proceedings an unexpected disruption, thus startling the audience.

Here we have another filmmaker’s trick, banking on an instinctive human reaction from viewers and guaranteed to elicit a jolt.

While a well-executed Jump-Scare can be admired, the gag has grown so very common in horror cinema as to become banal. Many critics dismiss as second-rate horror films that rely too much on Jump-Scares. Audiences have learned to recognize the set-up, and they know what’s coming. But even so, they still react as the filmmaker knows they will! It’s akin to that recoil we all experience when turning the crank of a Jack-in-the-Box toy—we know “Jack” is going to pop out at any moment, we just don’t know precisely when, and we can’t help but flinch when he does.

What we know today as the Jump-Scare was popularized in the 1940s by producer Val Lewton’s specialized B-movie unit, dedicated to turning out horror movies. A gifted, hands-on producer for the then-faltering RKO Studios, Lewton’s noire, marvelously atmospheric output belied the meagre budgets allotted his team.

Their first film was Cat People (1942), the story of a beautiful young woman who believes she is beset by a hereditary curse that sees her transform into a fierce panther when sexually aroused. As such, she fears consummating her recent marriage.

In one scene, jealous of a rival who has developed a fondness for her husband, she follows the woman home. It’s night, with only streetlamps providing intervals of light as the camera cuts back and forth from the pursued to the pursuer. The woman followed is uneasy, repeatedly glancing behind her, sensing that somebody—or something—is tailing her. She quickens her pace, with the clicking of her high-heels on the sidewalk audibly intensifying the tempo of the sequence. Fearful, she stops under an oasis of welcome light, hugging the lamppost and again apprehensively glancing back. What might be a feline growl is heard, just for an instant, before a bus unexpectedly pulls up, pneumatic brakes hissing loudly as the driver opens his door and beckons her in. Before climbing aboard, she spies movement in the bushes above a high stone wall paralleling the sidewalk—just the wind, or something else?

And so from this sequence was the original term for a Jump-Scare coined: The Lewton Bus.

MUSIC:

The faint tremolo of strings, rising to a crescendo as we creep ever closer to a shock, the driving bass of a chase sequence, the piano melody conveying a quiet moment of relief from the mayhem… In horror cinema and television, accompanying music helps to set the mood—tense, frantic, ghastly!

Memorable music from horror films and television series include that of Alfred Hitchcock Presents (also known as The Alfred Hitchcock Hour, 1955-1965; theme music by Charles Gounod), The Twilight Zone (1959-1964; theme music originally by Bernard Herrmann, subsequently by Marius Constant), Psycho (1960; score by Bernard Herrmann), Jaws (1975; score by John Williams), The Omen (1976; score by Jerry Goldsmith), Halloween (1978; score by John Carpenter), The Thing (1982; score by Ennio Morricone), Creepshow (1982; score by John Harrison), and The X-Files (1993-2018; theme music by Mark Snow).

I would be remiss not to mention the likes of Herman Stein, Hans J. Salter, Heinz Roemheld, and Britain’s James Bernard, to name just a few of the many unsung or lesser-known film composers collectively responsible for establishing the soundtrack of sci-fi/horror cinema during the first half of the 20th century. Along with selections of classical music, the stock-music compositions of this cohort comprised the scores of early horror films like Universal’s Frankenstein (1931), The Mummy (1932), The Wolf Man (1941), and House of Horrors (1946). Often working uncredited, this largely anonymous group of musicians also provided scores for sci-fi/horror B-movies and classics like It Came from Outer Space (1953), The Creature from the Black Lagoon (1954), This Island Earth (1955), and The Quatermass Xperiment (1955), first of Hammer’s Quatermass films. The modern stars of genre film composing took their cues from such originators.

HORROR:

This middle level of horror, King states, delivers shock value! It’s the reveal, the moment the masked killer, the slimy creature, the unspeakable aberration appears before the protagonists in all its slavering glory, full monty, if you will. When well executed, either by vivid, descriptive prose or visual effect, we are sufficiently horrified at the monster, the very source of our fear.

In “The Call of Cthulhu” (1928), H. P. Lovecraft describes a “Horror in Clay,” not, in fact, Cthulhu himself, but an artistic interpretation of the cosmic entity, for as any Lovecraft reader knows, the legendary Great Old One, who even primitive men have never beheld, has for eons laid inert with others in a sunken city beneath the sea. Telepathically inhabiting the minds of men, “moulding their dreams,” Cthulhu is worshipped by secret cults and awaits the proper alignment of stars that will signal his resurrection.

In his inimitable style, Lovecraft presented readers with a tiny, rectangular bas-relief, depicting “…a figure of evidently pictorial intent, though its impressionistic execution forbade a very clear idea of its nature. It seemed to be a sort of monster, or symbol representing a monster, of a form which only a diseased fancy could conceive. If I say that my somewhat extravagant imagination yielded simultaneous pictures of an octopus, a dragon, and a human caricature, I shall not be unfaithful to the spirit of the thing. A pulpy, tentacled head surmounted a grotesque and scaly body with rudimentary wings; but it was the general outline of the whole which made it most shockingly frightful.”

Further along, a small statuette of Cthulhu is examined, with Lovecraft offering more detail:

One sight of the thing had been enough to throw the assembled men of science into a state of tense excitement, and they lost no time in crowding around him to gaze at the diminutive figure whose utter strangeness and air of genuinely abysmal antiquity hinted so potently at unopened and archaic vistas. No recognised school of sculpture had animated this terrible object, yet centuries and even thousands of years seemed recorded in its dim and greenish surface of unplaceable stone.

The figure, which was finally passed slowly from man to man for close and careful study, was between seven and eight inches in height, and of exquisitely artistic workmanship. It represented a monster of vaguely anthropoid outline, but with an octopus-like head whose face was a mass of feelers, a scaly, rubbery-looking body, prodigious claws on hind and fore feet, and long, narrow wings behind. This thing, which seemed instinct with a fearsome and unnatural malignancy, was of a somewhat bloated corpulence, and squatted evilly on a rectangular block or pedestal covered with undecipherable characters. The tips of the wings touched the back edge of the block, the seat occupied the centre, whilst the long, curved claws of the doubled-up, crouching hind legs gripped the front edge and extended a quarter of the way down toward the bottom of the pedestal. The cephalopod head was bent forward, so that the ends of the facial feelers brushed the backs of huge fore paws which clasped the croucher’s elevated knees. The aspect of the whole was abnormally life-like, and the more subtly fearful because its source was so totally unknown. Its vast, awesome, and incalculable age was unmistakable; yet not one link did it shew with any known type of art belonging to civilisation’s youth—or indeed to any other time. Totally separate and apart, its very material was a mystery; for the soapy, greenish-black stone with its golden or iridescent flecks and striations resembled nothing familiar to geology or mineralogy. The characters along the base were equally baffling; and no member present, despite a representation of half the world’s expert learning in this field, could form the least notion of even their remotest linguistic kinship. They, like the subject and material, belonged to something horribly remote and distinct from mankind as we know it; something frightfully suggestive of old and unhallowed cycles of life in which our world and our conceptions have no part.

TERROR:

King speaks of the top-most of his three levels of horror as “the finest element,” Terror, which he defines as those suspenseful moments before the monster is revealed! Key is the anticipation of encountering whatever lurks in the dark, or looms in the mist, or awaits at the bottom of the stairs.

Dean Koontz is of like mind, asserting that the anticipation of violence is more “fun” than the violence itself. The suspense of inching through a funhouse corridor waiting for the ghoul to pop out makes for a better sequence than the moment the ghoul actually springs forward from a trap door!

In Aliens (1986), tension is palpable as the Colonial Marines advance methodically, carefully through the corridors of Hadley’s Hope, the terraforming facility on LV-426, checking room after room. They find and examine signs of the acid-bleeding aliens having been present, but encounter none. By design, the action moves slowly, deliberately, and suspense builds.

Meanwhile, the audience are on the edge of their seats, for they know what awaits the marines: sooner or later, the aliens will leap out. And when they do, the tempo shifts in an instant to fast and furious!

As with good sex, foreplay has built to a climax.

Stephen King spends two spine-tingling pages on young Danny just opening the door of Room 217 and stepping inside to find the dead woman in the bathtub, Koontz notes of The Shining (1977). And when she suddenly opens her eyes and reaches for him, the switch is thrown and the rest of that scene moves with lightning speed.

“The whole book is one delicious anticipation sequence,” he adds, “in that we know that, sooner or later, Jack Torrance is going to go after his son with an axe. Tension has built to an excruciating level when that climax finally comes.”

Other Horror specialists, however, argue that we need not necessarily meet the antagonist. In fact, counterintuitively perhaps, it’s rather more terrifying if we don’t, or if contact is but fleeting, shadowy.

To return to our Aliens example, while Ripley and the audience have faced a Xenomorph before, at this point, the marines have not and so the scene described above works well because she and the audience know more than do the characters advancing through the terraforming facility, and because they empathize with those characters and know that some of them are about to die.

But how much more terrifying were the skirmishes with this deadly creature in Alien (1979)—tight close-ups of teeth and claws, quick glimpses—was that a tentacle, or a tail?—the monster always partially hidden. The alien was nothing we could solidify in our minds. It was an unknown, and let’s not forget what Lovecraft had to say about fear of the unknown.

A full reveal, then, would in that moment, arguably, drop us down a rung on King’s ladder to the Horror level, still an effective scare, but not nearly as intense as the high-level Terror that ensues when our imaginations are left to do the heavy lifting.

Genre writer William F. Nolan (1928-2021) observed that nothing is so frightening as what’s behind the closed door. But when that door is thrown open and a ten-foot-tall creature is standing there in the doorway, we are apt to feel a little disappointed, oddly relieved, for we were thinking that the monster might be 100 feet tall!

Similarly, Charles L. Grant opined, “I prefer the threat of the razor to the blow of the bludgeon; I like shadows more than daylight.” To describe in graphic detail the results of an attack by a madman or monster is an “insult to the imagination.” Many singularly unimaginative directors of horror movies and writers of novels make this mistake. Reaction to such a scene is revulsion, not fear, not terror.

In the urban legend labeled “The Hook,” or the classic W. W. Jacobs short story “The Monkey’s Paw” (1902), or The Blair Witch Project (1999), we are not confronted with anything outright nasty, but our imagination conjures up far more of a scare than any prose or special effect ever could. The suggestion alone is enough to get our mind’s eye working. We are thinking about what monstrosity must have been skulking so very close, just outside the car, the door, or the tent.

Stylistic techniques used by writers to manufacture suspense—that essential ingredient—include using simpler words and shorter sentences as the narrative approaches a Moment of Violence, giving the reader an increasing sense of unstoppable, headlong forward motion.

Yet in his novel The Vision (1977), Koontz took the opposite approach. To convey the chaos and frenzy of the killer’s knife attack on the lead character, he wrote much of the encounter as one long, breathless sentence.

As mentioned regarding Setting, brief scene- and mood-establishing imagery, and character descriptions as the moment approaches may use words related to danger and death, subliminally suggesting to the reader that the protagonist is in peril, and might die—“the place was as quiet as a morgue,” or “the old man’s face was withered and as pale as a corpse,” or “her blood-red gown stood in marked contrast to the bleak, ashen surroundings.” You get the idea.

All of these crucial elements naturally intermingle and in the hands of a skilled Master of the Macabre, a Practitioner of the Petrifying, a Doctor of the Dreadful, a Sultan of the Scare—okay, we’re done—and are expertly blended just so in order to deliver the utmost in dark, creepy, bloodcurdling thrills and terror on both page and screen.

SOME FINAL ADVICE

We’ll close with a few words of advice for fan-fiction writers and aspiring horror novelists or screenwriters:

Author Robert Bloch (1917-1994), best known for Psycho (1959), counselled that a good horror writer must incorporate originality—of prime importance—and write in a length most effective. There’s no need for a trilogy when a novel will do, or for a novel when a short story suffices, or for a feature-length film when a half-hour TV episode does the job. And if a theme is shopworn, the twist or payoff should be fresh.

Charles L. Grant counselled, “Find your monster from that which scares you. And remember that the monster is far more frightening as a shadow, an unknown, than as a Thing.”

Finally, writer, editor, and critic Douglas E. Winter (born 1950) outlines ten standards of excellence in horror fiction that may serve as a useful guide for the next H. P. Lovecraft, Shirley Jackson, Ramsey Campbell, Rod Serling, Mike Flanagan, Anne Rice, or Stephen King about to dip his or her quill into the horror inkwell:

1) Originality—bring something new to the table, or explore a fresh angle on a classic theme. 

2) Characterization—write sympathetic characters.

3) Reality—there is no effective horror without a contrasting reality. We must have the natural in order that we are made uneasy and frightened by the supernatural. 

4) Mystery—it is not the job of the horror writer to answer all the questions. It’s not particularly frightening if everything is explained in some logical manner on the last page, effectively diluting the terror. Leave the reader with some mystery, something to wonder about, something to fear. 

5) Bad Taste—the best horror fiction tests the boundaries of acceptable behaviour. The reader is forced to grapple with society’s taboos laid bare before him. But even the most abhorrent perversions can be forgiven if done with style.

6) Suggestion—the horrors are always more effective when suggested and left to the imagination than when explicitly presented, an approach often employed in horror cinema, unfortunately.

7) Subtext—great horror fiction provides all the shocks and scares of the carnival funhouse, but offers, as well, comment on the human condition, a lasting impression the reader takes with him/her beyond the last page. Stephen King’s Salem’s Lot imprints upon the classic vampire lore sociopolitical themes. Carrie, too, comments on the sometimes relentless cruelty of high school bullying. 

8) Subversion—in, particularly, the conventional American movie context, swimming against the current comes with awful consequences—don’t talk to strangers, don’t party, don’t have casual sex with your boyfriend in the back of his car, don’t step outside the puritanical constricts of society, don’t be subversive or the bogeyman will get you. But perhaps conforming is the worst horror of all! 

9) Monsters—the traditional monsters of the genre—vampires, werewolves, space aliens—are joined by the modern monsters of our world—disaffected youth, narcissists and psychopaths, child abusers, soulless corporations. In other words, us! A good monster, whether actual or allegorical, worldly or otherworldly, is essential.

10) Endgame—a good horror story requires a satisfying ending. The writer must awaken the reader from the nightmare and return him/her to the workaday world, but not without a good dose of lingering anxiety. This particular episode has concluded but is it really over? Will the monster be back? How long before the threat arises once more? Can we ever really be safe again?

DIY HALLOWEEN 2026 e-MEETING, POST 2 of 4 – Ghastly Gimmicks: The Life and Career of William Castle

This is Post 2 of 4.

At this moment, the club is holding its annual Super Sci-Fi Book Sale at our downtown meeting locale. As such, there is no interactive ZOOM-chat component included with this month’s MonSFFA event.

But for our out-of-town club members and friends, we do offer today, here online, a few Halloween-themed items of interest, culled from our meeting archives of these past few years.

The Horror, The Horror…

For your perusal, then, we offer this comprehensive overview of the life and career of filmmaker William Castle, known to genre fans for his B-picture horror movies and the many wild marketing gimmicks he employed to promote them.

William Castle was a film producer and director, and occasional screenwriter and actor, almost exclusively working in B-movies. His career spanned four decades, from the 1940s through the 1960s and into the ’70s. Castle’s resumé lists some 100 or more films. He also worked in television. But of particular interest to us this afternoon are his dozen or so horror and fantasy/sci-fi films, and the sometimes over-the-top publicity stunts that he employed to promote his movies, crazy marketing gimmicks with names like “Emergo,” “Percepto,” and “Illusion-O.”

Castle has was born William Schloss, Jr. in 1914, to a Jewish-American family living in New York City. He suffered the tragic loss of his mother when he was just 9 years old, his father soon after, leaving the young William an orphan at age 11. Thereafter, he was raised by his older sister.

THEATRE YEARS: DRACULA, BROADWAY

At age 13 he became captivated by one of horror fiction’s most famous characters after seeing a performance of a new Broadway play. The year was 1927 and the play was “Dracula.”

Pictured here is the original Helen Hayes Theatre prior to its demolition in the early 1980s. In 1927, it was known as the Fulton Theatre, to which Castle returned over and over again to see Dracula.

“I knew then what I wanted to do with my life,” he wrote in his autobiography. “I wanted to scare the pants off audiences.” His path was set, but it wasn’t going to be a quick or an easy one!

Cast as Dracula in the play was a Hungarian actor, Bela Lugosi, starring in his first major English-speaking role; his co-star was the lovely Dorothy Peterson. Lugosi and another of his castmates, Edward Van Sloan, who played Van Helsing, would go on to star in Universal’s film adaptation of Dracula, released in 1931.

Before too long, through a combination of bold bluff and chutzpah, Castle met and befriended Lugosi, who invited the youngster to watch the play from backstage. This vantage point permitted Castle to take in the workings of putting on a stage play. Later, Lugosi recommended the boy for the position of assistant stage manager with the production’s touring company. Castle quit school at age 15 to take the job and soon demonstrated a knack for showy promotion, arranging for coffins in lobbies and hearses parked outside theatres. He would spend his teenage years working on Broadway in a variety of functions, from set-building to acting to directing. His first directing assignment came at age 18, helming a production of Dracula!

All of this helped ready him as a future filmmaker. It was during this period that he adopted his stage name, simply translating the surname, Schloss, from German to English; schloss is German for castle or manor, hence, he became William Castle.

THEATRE YEARS: STONY CREEK, ELLEN SCHWANNEKE

In late 1938, Orson Welles and his famous Mercury Theatre company were staging a summer stock production at this venue, the Stony Creek Theatre in Connecticut, prior to Welles departing for Hollywood to shoot Citizen Kane.

Made aware by one of the Mercury Theatre players that Welles was soon leaving for Hollywood and planned to close the theatre, Castle again drew upon luck and his aptitude for creative misrepresenta-tion in order to get hold of Welles’ private phone number. He convinced Welles not to close the theatre, but instead, lease it to him. Castle had capitalized on circumstances to secure himself a theatre from which to produce stage plays.

His next move was to hire German actress Ellen Schwanneke as his leading lady. Castle and Schwanneke had earlier met at a party and he found himself rather taken with this beautiful woman, who had fled her native country to escape the Nazis and was having difficulty finding acting work in America. Castle quickly propositioned her with an offer to star in a play at his freshly acquired theatre. Schwanneke was a stage and screen star in Germany famous for her role in Mädchen in Uniform (Girls in Uniform, 1931), a movie about young girls at a strict boarding school. The film explored subtle but unmistakable lesbian themes and was, at the time, well received in much of Europe. Today, Mädchen in Uniform is considered a pioneering LGBTQ+ movie for its positive portrayal of Sapphic relationships. Schwanneke was 15 when she appeared in the film, pictured here with co-star Herta Thiele.

But despite a reworked edit featuring an alternate ending tailored to National Socialist ideals, the ruling Nazis had eventually labelled Mädchen in Uniform decadent and banned screenings in Germany.

Castle, meanwhile, ran afoul of Theatre Guild regulations in effect at the time favouring American actors and prohibiting the Berlin-born actress from appearing on stage in any but a play originally performed in Germany. Castle countered that he had hired Schwanneke for “Das ist nicht fur Kinder” (Not for Children), a play that he conjured up on the spot so as to get around the rules! He spent a weekend writing the play and having it translated into German. Castle is pictured, here, with Schwanneke and another actor rehearsing on the theatre’s lawn, circa 1939.

When the public learned that Welles and the Mercury Theatre were not involved, however, interest in the upcoming play, its unknown producer, and star Schwanneke proved tepid. Advance box office activity was decidedly weak, until fate suddenly presented Castle with an unexpected and mighty marketing opportunity!

It happened that the Nazi regime issued a gold-embossed invitation to Schwanneke to return to her homeland and perform again on the German stage in Munich for a grand reunion of the country’s stage and film stars. She despised the pall of creative conformity the Nazis had imposed on the arts and while she was not Jewish, many of her friends and colleagues in the arts were, and she found their persecution by the Nazis abhorrent. She had no desire to return to a Germany under Hitler. Her story was later capsulized in this 1945 newspaper report on the occasion of her becoming an American citizen.

Castle seized the moment to release to the press what he claimed was a telegram he had sent to Hitler categorically turning down the invitation, trumpeting Schwanneke as the star of a new play opening soon at the Stony Creek Theatre, and touting her as “The Girl Who Said ‘No’ to Hitler.” Interest in Schwanneke and the play ballooned overnight, as did the box office, and just to ensure that the hype remained at a maximum, Castle, late at night, surreptitiously “vandalized” his own theatre, painting swastikas and Nazi slogans on the building. The following morning he defiantly avowed that the show would go on, and that the intimidation tactics of Nazi thugs would not deter the scheduled opening of the play! The crowning touch was to request State Militia protection for opening night, which was granted. The torrent of publicity surrounding this whole episode guaranteed the play’s success.

HOLLYWOOD STUDIO YEARS: COLUMBIA

In 1939, Castle left the theatre behind and headed west to Hollywood to work for notoriously cold-blooded studio boss Harry “King” Cohn at Columbia Pictures. Cohn was fond of B-movies and well after the other major studios had abandoned the form, Columbia continued to produce them. It was in this B-movie milieu that Castle developed as a filmmaker.

He began as a dialogue director, soon graduating to other assignments and learning everything he could about the film business as he progressed. He was one of the few people Cohn liked and in 1943, the studio boss gave him a chance to direct, handing him the reigns on Chance of Lifetime (1943), the sixth of 14 Boston Blackie films produced by Columbia in the 1940s.

Boston Blackie, played by Chester Morris in all 14 films, was a reformed jewel thief who solved daring crimes to avoid being fingered as a suspect himself. Castle recalls that Chance of a Lifetime’s script was “lousy, dull, contrived,” and peopled with wooden characters speaking unbelievably bad dialogue. Shot in just 12 days, Castle fretted that his first film as a director was a real turkey!

But Cohn saw something in Castle that prompted him to give the novice director another chance. The Whistler (1944), based on the popular radio series of the day, was a film noir mystery, the first of eight produced by Columbia. This time, Castle scored a hit. He would ultimately direct four of those eight Whistler films (the other three being The Mark of the Whistler, 1944; Voice of the Whistler, 1945; and Mysterious Intruder, 1946).

During the 1940s and 1950s, Castle directed a variety of B-movies—noir crime and mysteries, westerns, sword and sandal epics, family dramas, adventure films, romances—earning a reputation as a director who could bring in a picture quickly and under budget.

He was among many unsung filmmakers of this era, plying their trade, learning from each other and honing their craft. Castle worked, at one point, with Sam Katzman’s serial unit; he was photographed, here, with producer Katzman (center), who later, in the 1950s, made bargain-basement genre films like Creature With the Atom Brain (1955), Zombies of Mora Tau (1957), The Night the World Exploded (1957), and The Giant Claw (1957). The third fellow in the photo is director Spencer Gordon Bennet, who has presided over more serials than any other director.

HOLLYWOOD STUDIO YEARS: WELLES AND THE LADY FROM SHANGHAI

Castle crossed paths again with Orson Welles for the noir classic The Lady from Shanghai (1947).

Welles had run out of money on a theatrical production he was preparing and called Harry Cohn from the theatre to appeal for a cash bail-out, promising to write, produce, and direct a film for Cohn at no fee. Cohn agreed and according to Welles, while on the phone with Cohn, he happened to notice a book laying on the table and told Cohn that the film would be based on that novel, which a woman working in the theatre’s box office had been reading. Welles had never read the book.

But Castle’s daughter, many years later, told a different story. She claims Castle had purchased the film rights to the book and asked Welles to pitch the idea of a film adaptation to Cohn, hoping to get the nod as director himself. While Castle greatly admired Welles’ talents and respected the man, he was understandably disappointed to be tasked with assistant-director duties under Welles on the project, which would star Welles and his soon-to-be-ex-wife, Rita Hayworth, whom the Hollywood press had dubbed “The Love Goddess.”

Her performance as the piece’s femme fatale coupled with Welles’ inspired visual style cemented the film as a masterful noir classic, despite it having received mixed reviews upon initial release.

Castle, credited as an associate producer, directed much of the second unit location work uncredited and helped Welles write the script, also without credit.

Castle’s signature pose, incidentally, cigar jutting from his mouth, was something he picked up from Welles, who often paced back and forth on set smoking a Cuban.

In 1948 Castle married Ellen Falck; they would go on to have two children. By the late 1950s, Castle’s ambitions had yet to be satisfied and he decided to strike out on his own so as to be free to make the movies he wanted to make.

THE INDEPENDENT YEARS: LES DIABOLIQUES INSPIRES MACABRE

The French film Les Diaboliques (1955), a psychological thriller, was showing in the U.S. at about this time and provided Castle with inspiration for his first independent production, which he financed by mortgaging his house! He partnered with screenwriter Robb White to form a production company, with plans to produce five films over 16 months.

An exercise in grim horror and suspense, Macabre (1958) is about a wealthy, dysfunctional family, including two sisters who ultimately meet with tragedy, their lovers and acquaintances, and a dastardly plot in which a kidnapper telephones to relate that the young daughter of one of the sisters has been buried alive!

The cast included Jim Backus and Ellen Corby, later to star in TV’s Gilligan’s Island and The Waltons, respectively, and Susan Morrow, who genre fans will recognize as Lambda, from Cat-Women of the Moon (1953).

Everything was on the line and Castle vigorously promoted the film by what is called “barnstorming”—that is, accompanying the film to different markets and promoting it along the way with publicity stunts like parking hearses outside movie theatres and positioning fake nurses inside, ready to “look after” anyone overcome by fright. Castle made personal appearances at local premieres to talk up his picture and schmooze with audiences, arriving in a hearse or emerging from a coffin.

But the utmost PR gimmick deployed was a genuine insurance policy from Lloyd’s of London that would pay $1000 to the beneficiaries of anyone, excepting those with known heart or nervous conditions, who died of fright while watching Macabre! Movie-goers would be handed their bona fide policy when they purchased a ticket.

It all worked swimmingly and the film grossed a million dollars in its first year of release against a budget estimated at about $90,000. Box office receipts over the years amounted to some $5,000,000.

THE INDEPENDENT YEARS: CASTLE HELPS HOLLYWOOD COUNTER THE LURE OF TELEVISION

Next was House on Haunted Hill (1959), with White again scripting and future horror icon Vincent Price starring. There was a lot of screaming!

The gimmick, here, was “Emergo,” heavily promoted at theatres as the “New Electronic Process.” While that sounds like some kind of revolutionary method of film projection, or image enhancement, the only thing electronic about Emergo was a this: a pulley motor and the red lightbulbs that illuminated the eyes of a plastic skeleton that emerged from behind a curtain and flew out over the theatre audience at a critical moment during the film!

Pictured here is a technician installing the Emergo system.

Once word spread, the flying skeleton became the target of youngsters throwing popcorn and balled-up candy wrappers. But many were doing so during their second and third screening of the movie, to which they had brought along their friends! All good for the box office, and the fun, travelling carnival haunted house-like gimmick quickly became that which was most talked about, not so much the movie itself.

The 1950s was a time during which the motion picture industry was competing for audiences with that new-fangled invention, television. Movie theatre ticket sales were in decline and so, larger screen formats—CinemaScope, Cinerama, VistaVision—and premium colour and sound systems—TechniColor, hi-fidelity stereo—were deployed, as well as 3-D technology, to entice people away from the TVs in their living rooms and back into movie theatres. Castle’s instincts, then, were not off-beam; he had the right idea.

Also in 1959, Castle brought audiences The Tingler, with Robb White and Vincent Price again contributing their talents. The gimmick devised to promote this film was dubbed “Percepto.” Promotional material was prepared for the press and movie exhibitors touting the gimmick as a sure-fire marketing tool.

Percepto consisted of small vibrating motors, used as de-icers on aircraft, installed under a handful of theatre seats and triggered at a critical moment during the screening of the film. At one point, the movie breaks the fourth wall to involve the audience in a climactic scene.

The Tingler was the first major motion picture to depict the use of LSD—colloquially, “Acid”—which screenwriter White had experimented with after hearing about the psychedelic hallucinogen from Aldous Huxley, author of the dystopian SF novel Brave New World (1932). Price’s character uses the drug in an attempt to provoke in himself extreme fear as part of his research on the parasitic Tingler. Here, the prop Tingler “grips” Price’s arm.

Promotional material challenged movie-goers to experience Percepto, and Castle and his stars pushed the film at theatres. Lobby displays provided directives should the Tingler break loose in the theatre, which of course, it most certainly would!

Castle was not averse to including a gimmick in the film itself. In one scene of the black-and-white film, we see a bathtub filled with vibrant red blood to give the sequence an extra kick. This was achieved by shooting the scene in colour, for which the set was painted in shades of grey and the costuming sewn of grey fabrics, with the actress wearing white make-up.

Castle and White opened the sixties with 13 Ghosts (1960), a supernatural horror movie about a mansion full of spectres and the family that is bequeathed the house, provided they live in and do not sell the property.

The fully-furnished mansion includes a fortune hidden somewhere within the premises, a special pair of glasses that permits one to see the ghosts haunting the place, and a weird housekeeper who conducts séances, played by Margaret Hamilton, The Wizard of Oz’s Wicked Witch of the West.

Castle himself provides instructions on how to use the Ghost Viewer in an opening sequence and Hamilton breaks the fourth wall at the end of 13 Ghosts to suggest that her housekeeper character and the Wicked Witch are one and the same!

Promoted as “eerie-sistable,” the gimmick, here, was “Illusion-O,” a photographic process that allowed audiences, when prompted on-screen, to see the ghosts in “Ectoplasmic Colour,” despite this being a black-and-white movie.

Patrons were handed a free “Ghost Viewer” as they entered the theatre, with which they might either see the ghosts on the screen, or remove them from the picture.

Shown here is some of the printed publicity material for the film; additional promotions were in place at some theatres, like these “Lucky Ghost Cards.”

The ghosts were simply actors in various ghoulish costumes filmed separately, that footage tinted red, and superimposed over blue-tinted footage of the “living” actors and sets. The Ghost Viewer, thus, either visually intensified or desaturated the ghosts appearing on screen.

Vincent Price did not appear in 13 Ghosts, but did visit the set, as evidenced by this publicity photo.

And the spinning ghostly flame optical effect used in 13 Ghosts was later repurposed to represent the incorporeal entity feeding on hate and violence in classic Star Trek’s “Day of the Dove.”

THE INDEPENDENT YEARS: CASTLE AND HITCHCOCK

Castle’s competition that year was a psychological horror picture by another director known for his mastery of the suspense/thriller.

Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho (1960) far outstripped 13 Ghosts at the box office. Interestingly, it was the financial success of B-movies by Castle and Roger Corman that convinced Hitchcock to make Psycho. He even employed a Castle-like gimmick at screenings, that of not allowing late admissions to screenings.

And Hitchcock cited Les Diaboliques as an inspiration, just as Castle had two years earlier when putting together Macabre.

Castle admired Hitchcock’s work and responded to Psycho the following year with his own psychological horror film, Homicidal (1961), which was strongly influenced by Psycho.

The story involves a homecare nurse, Emily, in the employ of a wealthy family, for which she is looking after an elderly, mute invalid named Helga. Other characters include Miriam and her boyfriend, Glen, and Miriam’s half-brother Warren, recently returned from Denmark after the death of his last surviving parent. There are family secrets a-plenty and an inheritance at stake, too, as we quickly learn that the enigmatic Emily is completely unhinged and somehow connected to Warren.

Castle’s gimmick for Homicidal was the “Fright Break,” a pause in the suspenseful climax of the film to allow any audience member too scared to watch the end of the movie to leave and receive a full refund.

Of course, to claim their refund, they had to follow the “yellow streak” painted on the floor while bathed in a yellow spotlight, out of the theatre and into the lobby. There, a nurse awaited to offer a blood-pressure test, and finally, the anxious audience member had to report to “Coward’s Corner” so that all would know their shame!

It would seem counterintuitive to interrupt the action just as the tension is mounting, but strangely, it kinda works!

In some markets, Castle also hired people to promote the film out on the streets. Columbia’s press book for the film provided the usual publicity photos and touted the “Fright Break” and “Coward’s Corner” gimmicks to theatre owners as “Showmanship that Sets Records,” for some exhibitors were beginning to grumble that booking a William Castle movie involved a lot of extra work.

The cast included a new name, Jean Arless, dubbed the “Homicidal Girl.” But Jean Arless was a stage name. You see, the character of Emily and the character of Warren were played by the same thespian!

Castle came up with the gender-non-specific name so as not to tip his hand—Jean could be interpreted as feminine, as in actress Jean Harlow, or masculine, as in Jean Chrétien, the former Canadian prime minister. One could easily accept that Jean Arless was, perhaps, a French actor come to America. But he wasn’t.

Jean Arless was, in fact, actress Joan Marshall, who successfully auditioned for both roles, impressing Castle with her transformation from female to male. You may know her from another production, Star Trek’s “Court Martial.”

THE INDEPENDENT YEARS: CASTLE IN THE SIXTIES

1961 also saw Castle release Mr. Sardonicus, a period piece about a nobleman stricken with a fright-induced facial deformity—a perpetual, grisly grin (medically, a condition called Risus Sardonicus).

Phantom of the Opera-like, he wears a mask to hide his face.

Assisted by Krull, his “Igor,” if you will, Sardonicus begins conducting sadistic experiments in his castle, preying on local women and hoping to find a cure for his condition, which a doctor summoned from England may be able to provide, albeit under duress.

The gimmick Castle came up with for this film was called the “Punishment Poll.” He appears briefly at the end of the picture, breaking the fourth wall to poll the audience on whether Mr. Sardonicus should be shown mercy for his transgressions, or receive punishment.

While he claims to have shot two endings, one for each possible outcome of the audience’s vote, there has never been found a print of the film which included a merciful ending.

1962’s Zotz is a fantasy/comedy about a man who comes into possession of an ancient, magical amulet that imbues him with certain fantastic powers.

A young Tom Poston stars; you may recognize him as handyman George Utley, a character on the long-running sit-com Newhart (1982-1990).

The gimmick associated with this film was a simple give-away, a replica of the film’s amulet, usable as a key chain. Castle’s financial backers were, by now, urging him to scale back or do away altogether with his elaborate and sometimes quite expensive gimmicks.

Other William Castle films produced in the 1960s came with rather more tame promotional gimmicks than his usual, or without benefit of any at all. 13 Frightened Girls (1963) is part teen drama, part espionage thriller.

Castle highlighted his casting call for young girls from various countries to portray the daughters of diplomats. Apparently, scenes featuring each girl were shot especially for the home markets of each.

A comedic horror movie, The Old Dark House (1963) was a remake of the 1932 James Whale classic and starred Zotz’s Tom Poston.

Castle featured a famous guest and fellow traveller in the macabre as his opening-titles artist.

If you don’t recognize the name, you almost certainly know of his most celebrated work.

In 1964, Castle took a stab at what has been unflatteringly termed “Psycho-Biddy” or “Hagsploitation.” The promotional strategy for Strait-Jacket (1964), his psychological horror/thriller about an axe murderess, was to promote the film as “from the author of Psycho, the director of Homicidal, and the co-star of Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?”—Robert Block, Castle, and Joan Crawford, respectively. Name recognition, Castle hoped, would draw film-goers.

Crawford had co-starred with Bette Davis in the hit, Oscar-worthy chiller Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? (1962), launching a new horror sub-genre which involves mentally unbalanced and violent older women.

In Strait-Jacket, she plays a woman just released from a psychiatric hospital who is suspected of committing a spate of recent axe murders. While no Hitchcock, Castle demonstrates a certain panache for this type of thing.

Here, he poses with some of the prop severed heads used in the production, and on location with his leading ladies, Crawford and Diane Baker.

He couldn’t resist, I suppose, leaning a little on his signature marketing flair for Strait-Jacket, arranging for in-person appearances by star Crawford at some screenings, and handing out to movie-goers as they entered the theatre promotional cardboard axes emblazoned with the film’s title.

Once-married couple Barbara Stanwyck and Robert Taylor starred in Castle’s 1964 production The Night Walker, scripted by Robert Bloch.

As with Strait-Jacket earlier that same year, Castle relied on name recognition to sell the picture, a surreal psychological horror piece exploring the world of dreams and nightmares.

A five-minute promotional short featuring a hired hypnotist questioning people about their dreams was also produced to help market Night Walker, along with a novelization of Robert Bloch’s screenplay.

Joan Crawford was originally offered Stanwyck’s role but declined as she was, at the time, committed to Hush…Hush, Sweet Charlotte (1964), from which she would, ultimately, drop out shortly after principal photography had begun, thus scuttling a reunion with her Whatever Happened to Baby Jane co-star, Bette Davis. Olivia de Havilland stepped in as Crawford’s replacement.

As for the modestly budgeted Night Walker, despite largely positive reviews, the film proved a financial failure for Castle.

I Saw What You Did (1965) anticipated such later horror/slasher films as When a Stranger Calls (1979) and Scream (1996). Two teenaged girls amuse themselves making prank phone calls one night, telling whoever answers, “I saw what you did, and I know who you are.”

But when they connect to a man who has just murdered his wife, he believes they have witnessed his crime and comes looking for them. Joan Crawford is back in another Castle film, but hers is just a supporting role this time.

Castle arranged with the phone company for a special number to be activated so movie-goers could call in to hear a seductive female voice tell them “I saw what you did, and I know who you are,” then make a date to meet-up at whichever local movie house was screening the film. Also, giant plastic promotional phones borrowed from the phone company were initially part of the film’s publicity campaign, but after a string of prank calls like those depicted in the movie from mischievous teenagers, and the ensuing complaints, the phone company withdrew support.

Another gimmick considered was to install seatbelts in a section of the theatre for those “who might be scared out of their seats,” but the idea was abandoned before the film premiered. It was an idea, however, that would resurface decades later.

Set on a remote island, Let’s Kill Uncle (1966) is a dark comedy about a cat-and-mouse game of attempted assassination between a boy and girl, and the boy’s uncle, who plans to kill the lad for his inheritance.

The Busy Body (1967) is a horror/comedy about the effort to find the missing corpse of a mob courier, whose burial suit was stuffed with a million dollars. Popular comedian of the day Sid Caesar starred. The Busy Body is notable as Richard Pryor’s film debut.

The Spirit is Willing (1967) is a horror/comedy ghost story, again starring Caesar.

None of these was particular successful and Castle realized that such as his recent fare just wasn’t cutting it with modern audiences. He needed something…different.

1968’s Project X is his take on a science fiction espionage story of the far future, complete with cryogenics, genetic engineering, a world overpopulated, Western fears of Asian hegemony, and technology capable of memory manipulation and the viewing of a subject’s subconscious. And what’s a science fiction movie without a brain in a jar?

The film has the look and feel of its contemporaries, sci-fi films like Fantastic Voyage (1966), The Power (1968), Colossus: The Forbin Project (1970), Genesis II (1973), The Terminal Man (1974) and The Questor Tapes (1974).

Christopher George and Greta Baldwin starred, here filming on location—that’s Castle seated on the far left.

Animation house Hanna Barbera handled the sequences in which the protagonist’s mind is probed for information, his subconscious dreams viewed on a monitor. These sequences are a combination of live-action footage tinted, filtered, with weird double-exposures applied, all superimposed over animated sequences to arrive at a kind of dreamy, psychedelic trip! Some of the animation was lifted from an episode of the Saturday-morning cartoon spy-fi/adventure Jonny Quest (1964-1965).

Given the limitations of budget, this was a clever and effective way to pull off what otherwise would have been a complex and expensive sequence had it been conventionally shot, live-action. The non-realistic aspect, here, does not detract from proceedings in that these are the protagonist’s subconscious dreams.

THE INDEPENDENT YEARS: ROSEMARY’S BABY

That same year, Castle found a project he felt would pull him out of his box office doldrums, the supernatural horror/thriller Rosemary’s Baby (1968), which kicked off a wave of A-list, religiously-themed horror films released in the 1970s—The Omen (1976), The Amityville Horror (1979), Canada’s own contribution, The Pyx (1973), set in and filmed right here in Montreal, and, of course, The Exorcist (1973). This is a sub-genre the popularity of which continues to this day.

Castle had brought proofs of Ira Levin’s as yet unpublished novel to then Paramount Pictures executive Robert Evans, urging him to purchase the film rights. Evans agreed with Castle’s assessment of the book as having great commercial potential as an A-level picture and agreed to secure the rights. But Evans saw Castle as a B-horror-movie director and so limited him to producing the project. A young European auteur named Roman Polanski had impressed Evans and agreed to direct, provided he could also write the script. Castle was disappointed, of course, but upon meeting Polanski, took a liking to him.

Castle is seen, here, on location with stars Mia Farrow and John Cassavetes. He also appears in a cameo as the man waiting to use the phone after Rosemary completes her call.

None of Castle’s over-the-top gimmicks were used to publicize Rosemary’s Baby, but the film soon acquired something of a reputation as cursed when people associated with the production began experiencing a series of grave misfortunes, not the least of which was the brutal, bloody murder, the following year, of Polanski’s pregnant wife, Sharon Tate, at the hands of the infamous Manson family. Some believe that the film’s devilish subject matter is what manifested the curse. Castle himself, who was receiving hate-mail and death threats for having brought Rosemary’s Baby to movie screens, became seriously ill with kidney failure shortly after the film premiered and so was unable to capitalize on the success of Rosemary’s Baby and move into the ranks of A-list producers and directors.

THE INDEPENDENT YEARS: TWILIGHT OF CASTLE’S CAREER

His next film was his last in the director’s chair. Shanks (1974) is an oddball horror movie, self-described as “a grim fairy tale” and “deliciously grotesque.” French mime Marcel Marceau starred in dual roles, one a speaking part. This was Marceau’s first feature film. As the deaf, mute puppeteer Malcolm Shanks, he has the strange ability to manipulate dead bodies like puppets.

Castle acted in the 1975 comedy Shampoo, alongside stars Warren Beatty and Julie Christie. The film is based on the apparently wild swinging-sixties sex life of actress Joan Marshall, who was married to Shampoo director Hal Ashby in 1975. Like Castle, she appears briefly in the film. You will recall that she starred in Castle’s Homicidal under the pseudonym Jean Arless!

Castle appeared, as well that year, in The Day of the Locust, a satire of pre-World War II Hollywood focusing on the broken dreams of several characters, who had come to the motion picture capital seeking success and stardom. He cameos as the director of a period picture under production. This was his last on-screen appearance.

Also a 1975 release, his last film was the creature-feature Bug, about giant, intelligent, flying, fire-starting cockroaches!

Castle produced the film, and co-wrote the script with Thomas Page, author of the The Hephaestus Plague, the book upon which the film was based. Not one for the insect-averse!

Castle reverted to his old ways on this one, announcing that he had taken out a one million dollar life-insurance policy on his “star,” Hercules the Cockroach!

LEGACY

Castle’s autobiography, Step Right Up! I’m Gonna Scare the Pants Off America: Memoirs of a B-Movie Mogul, was published in 1976 and has been reprinted a couple of times since. William Castle died of a heart attack on May 31, 1977. He was only 63.

By all accounts, Castle was a charming, personable, gregarious, talented, determined and dynamic fellow, well-liked by his colleagues. He worked with a lot of very talented filmmakers over the years, and some of that movie magic undoubtedly rubbed off on him. While some might say he never amounted to anything more than a competent B-movie director and producer, having just once or twice breathed the rarefied air of Hollywood’s A-list filmmakers, I would argue that he is remembered as one of that singular breed of filmmaker whose name attached to a movie can, alone, draw an audience—Spielberg, Kubrick, Hitchcock, Harryhausen, Nolan…Castle.

No, he wasn’t the best ever, but he was certainly a competent director, gusting to inspired, excellent, daring! His affection for the horror genre in particular was always up on the screen. Yes, he was a carnival barker and purveyor of goofy gimmicks, but that’s what made his movies so much more fun, not just to watch, but to experience. He relished involving his audiences in the fun. Castle obviously loved his job, and despite the career disappointments and the condescension of critics and others over a lengthy career, he soldiered on, and he entertained his audiences. He brought flair, showmanship, and a sense of fun to the movie-going experience for generations of genre fans, inspiring future filmmakers, like John Waters, one of his biggest boosters, and Robert Zemeckis, who cites Castle as his favourite director.

Today, fans flock to retro-screenings of his films, with his classic gimmicks in full operation!

Authentic Castle give-aways in good condition are sought after by collectors.

At the peak of his popularity, he had a national fan club in an age without the Internet and social media.

He wasn’t the first to employ gimmicks to promote his films, but he was the definitive practitioner of the art, and others have since followed in his footsteps. Waters’ “Odorama,” for his film, Polyester (1981), was directly inspired by, and a tribute to Castle. Robert Zemeckis (Back to the Future trilogy, Who Framed Roger Rabbit?) named his production company for Castle, and had the goal of remaking some of his films. Working with Castle’s daughter, Terry, Zemeckis’ company remade House on Haunted Hill in 1999 and 13 Ghosts in 2001, stylized as Thir13en Ghosts.

Director Joe Dante (Gremlins, Piranha, The Howling) is another fan of Castle’s and perhaps the best of the Castle tributes is his Matinee (1993), with John Goodman’s Lawrence Woolsey character an unmistakable homage to William Castle, and “Atomo-Vision” to “Percepto.”

In this scene from the film, Woolsey installs Atomo-Vision under theatre seats in preparation for premiere night.

Produced for Matinee was a mock trailer for Mant, the fictional atomic-age sci-fi film Woolsey is promoting in Matinee, including with giant ant legs installed over the theatre entrance, as here depicted, something that Castle would no doubt have applauded. Filled with fond nods to Castle, check out the Mant trailer on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gLCevDdMFPA

NEXT POST, 3:00PM

DIY HALLOWEEN 2026 e-MEETING, POST 1 of 4 – Introduction, Halloween Quiz

This is Post 1 of 4.

At this moment, the club is holding its annual Super Sci-Fi Book Sale at our downtown meeting locale. As such, there is no interactive ZOOM-chat component included with this month’s MonSFFA event.

But for our out-of-town club members and friends, we do offer today, here online, a few Halloween-themed items of interest, culled from our meeting archives of these past few years.

The Horror, The Horror…

For your perusal, then, we begin with this Halloween Quiz. Good luck! We’ll run the answers in our closing post, today at 4:00PM.

1) Halloween is the day before which holiday?

2) The tradition of making Jack-o-Lanterns to ward off evil spirits is thousands of years old. Which vegetable were they originally made from?

3) According to superstition, if you stare into a mirror at midnight on Halloween, what will you see?

4) From which region in the world do pumpkins originate?

5) Who wrote the novel Frankenstein?

6) Transylvania is a region in which country?

7) Halloween has its origins in which ancient Celtic festival?

8) Which actor played Dr. Frank-n-Furter in The Rocky Horror Picture Show?

9) Is a pumpkin a fruit or vegetable?

10) What is the significance of seeing a spider on Halloween?

11) Which country celebrates the Day of the Dead starting at midnight on October 31?

12) According to superstition, a person born on Halloween has what particular ability?

13) Who directed The Nightmare Before Christmas?

14) “Don’t be afraid. I’m going to give you the choice I never had.” Which vampire spoke these words?

15) How many people were hanged during the Salem Witch Trials?

16) Every Halloween, Charlie Brown helps his friend Linus wait for which character to appear?

17) What do people “bob” for on Halloween?

18) Who is said to haunt the White House Rose Garden?

19) Pumpkins can be orange, white, green, or what other colour?

20) In the The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, how many people are killed with a chainsaw?

21) What’s the body-count in the film Halloween?

22) In which year was the movie Freaks made?

23) In the original Alien film, how many alien eggs were made for the egg chamber inside the downed spacecraft?

24) How many Oscar nominations did Psycho receive?

Next Post, 2:00PM

MonSFFA’S SUPER SCI-FI BOOK SALE OPENS TO THE PUBLIC IN JUST 24 HOURS!

Attention MonSFFA Club Members, and Sci-Fi Book Fans Across the Montreal Region!

MonSFFA’s annual Super Sci-Fi Book Sale opens to the public in just 24 hours, tomorrow afternoon, Saturday, October 17! Sale hours: 12:30PM-4:00PM! 

Be among the first bargain-hunters to peruse our sales tables, folks, and have your coins and folding money on hand for this bargain-bonanza of a chance to stock up on all your fall and winter sci-fi reading! Come one, come all! And don’t forget to bring with you a few shopping bags!

The Halloween season is upon us, and that’s the perfect time to revisit classic sci-fi/horror stories, or to start reading a fresh dark fantasy series! And remember, a good book makes a great present, so get an early jump on your Christmas gift shopping!

Paperbacks, hardcovers, trades, specialty books, plus many comics, magazines, and even a few DVDs—we’ll have hundreds upon hundreds of titles, from Asimov to Zelazny, at the lowest prices in all of known space! Take advantage of our “Bulk Book Bargains”—the more you buy, the more you save! Every deal a stellar steal, and all books tariff-free!

PLEASE TAKE NOTE: We are informed by our venue managers of a last-minute change of function room! Because our originally advertised “Salle St-Mathieu” will be unavailable on the event date, the Super Sci-Fi Book Sale will now take place in nearby “Salle René-Lévesque,” adjoining the hotel’s restaurant. To repeat, The Super Sci-Fi Book Sale has been moved to “Salle René-Lévesque,” at the downtown Nouvel Hotel, 1740 Boul. René-Lévesque O. (corner St-Mathieu, near downtown Metro stations and on major bus routes)! The entrance to the book sale is situated just to the left of the south “condo” tower’s main entrance, and is accessible directly from St-Mathieu Street, or from within the hotel complex. Please spread the word! And bring a couple friends to the sale!

Help us stage this event by volunteering to lend a hand with unpacking, set-up, and take-down! We require help especially on Friday evening, October 16, and Saturday morning, October 17, the day of the sale! Volunteer-club-members, and volunteers in general, are rewarded with first crack at our inventory of books, as well as with our eternal gratitude!

Contact MonSFFA at: president@monsffa.ca

Book sale update: download the price list!

Be sure to mark Saturday, October 17 in your calendars, folks, and gather your coins and folding money for this bargain-bonanza of a chance to stock up on all your fall and winter sci-fi reading! Come one, come all! And don’t forget to bring with you a few shopping bags!

 Saturday, October 17! Doors open to the public at 12:30PM! 

Book sale price list available here!

MonSFFA book sale 2025

 

 

SUPER SCI-FI BOOK SALE JUST A FEW DAYS AWAY!

Attention MonSFFA Club Members, and Sci-Fi Book Fans Across the Montreal Region!

MonSFFA’s annual Super Sci-Fi Book Sale will take place in just days, this Saturday, October 17! Doors open to the public at 12:30PM! 

Be sure to mark Saturday, October 17 in your calendars, folks, and gather your coins and folding money for this bargain-bonanza of a chance to stock up on all your fall and winter sci-fi reading! Come one, come all! And don’t forget to bring with you a few shopping bags!

The Halloween season is upon us, and that’s the perfect time to revisit classic sci-fi/horror stories, or to start reading a fresh dark fantasy series! And remember, a good book makes a great present, so get an early jump on your Christmas gift shopping!

Paperbacks, hardcovers, trades, specialty books, plus many comics, magazines, and even a few DVDs—we’ll have hundreds upon hundreds of titles, from Asimov to Zelazny, at the lowest prices in all of known space! Take advantage of our “Bulk Book Bargains”—the more you buy, the more you save! Every deal a stellar steal, and all books tariff-free!

PLEASE TAKE NOTE: We are informed by our venue managers of a last-minute change of function room! Because our originally advertised “Salle St-Mathieu” will be unavailable on the event date, the Super Sci-Fi Book Sale will now take place in nearby “Salle René-Lévesque,” adjoining the hotel’s restaurant. To repeat, The Super Sci-Fi Book Sale has been moved to “Salle René-Lévesque,” at the downtown Nouvel Hotel, 1740 Boul. René-Lévesque O. (corner St-Mathieu, near downtown Metro stations and on major bus routes)! The entrance to the book sale is situated just to the left of the south “condo” tower’s main entrance, and is accessible directly from St-Mathieu Street, or from within the hotel complex. Please spread the word! And bring a couple friends to the sale!

Help us stage this event by volunteering to lend a hand with unpacking, set-up, and take-down! We require help especially on Friday evening, October 16, and Saturday morning, October 17, the day of the sale! Volunteer-club-members, and volunteers in general, are rewarded with first crack at our inventory of books, as well as with our eternal gratitude!

Contact MonSFFA at: president@monsffa.ca

October 2026 Issue of Impulse Now Available! + Book Sale This Saturday; Latest Updates

Attention MonSFFA Club Members!

The latest issue of our club news bulletin, Impulse (October 2026) is now available for viewing or download! Visit the “Impulse Page” of this Website, or just click here:

ImpulseOctober2026(OnlineVersion)PDF

Past issues of Impulse can also be viewed or downloaded via our Website (www.MonSFFA.ca); visit the “Impulse Page.”

This October 2026 issue sets up our upcoming Super Sci-Fi Book Sale (Events Column), looks ahead to November’s scheduled club meeting, and reviews our recent September meeting, highlighting a virtual visit on that occasion by SF writer Sean Robins!

PLEASE NOTE: We have just received word of a last-minute change of function room from our venue managers regarding the Super Sci-Fi Book Sale!

Unfortunately, this news came after October’s issue of Impulse had been put to bed, and so the news bulletin does not reflect that change, which is simply this: the sale will be held in “Salle René-Lévesque,” adjoining the hotel’s restaurant, rather than in the originally advertised “Salle St-Mathieu.” We’ve updated scheduled posts on the club’s Website accordingly, but the word came too late to update our October issue of Impulse.

FOR THOSE VOLUNTEERING TO HELP WITH OUR BOOK SALE: Also, for those volunteering to help with the book sale set/up, we are meeting up in the lobby of the Nouvel Hotel at 6:00PM this Friday evening, October 16, and again at about 10:00AM on Saturday morning, October 17, the day of the sale. The book sale opens to the public at 12:00PM, Saturday, October 17.

Enjoy your issue of Impulse today!

SUPER SCI-FI BOOK SALE SET FOR THIS SATURDAY, OCTOBER 17!

Attention MonSFFA Club Members, and Sci-Fi Book Fans Across the Montreal Region!

We trust everyone appreciated the long holiday weekend and enjoyed a Happy Thanksgiving! Now, here’s one more thing for which the discerning SF/F fan can be thankful: MonSFFA’s annual Super Sci-Fi Book Sale! The sale will take place in just days, this Saturday, October 17! Doors open to the public at 12:30PM! 

Be sure to mark Saturday, October 17, in your calendars, folks, and gather your coins and folding money for this bargain-bonanza of a chance to stock up on all your fall and winter sci-fi reading! Come one, come all! And don’t forget to bring with you a few shopping bags!

The Halloween season is upon us, and that’s the perfect time to revisit classic sci-fi/horror stories, or to start reading a fresh dark fantasy series! And remember, a good book makes a great present, so get an early jump on your Christmas gift shopping!

Paperbacks, hardcovers, trades, specialty books, plus many comics, magazines, and even a few DVDs—we’ll have hundreds upon hundreds of titles, from Asimov to Zelazny, at the lowest prices in all of known space! Take advantage of our “Bulk Book Bargains”—the more you buy, the more you save! Every deal a stellar steal!

PLEASE TAKE NOTE: We are informed by our venue managers of a last-minute change of function room! Because our originally advertised “Salle St-Mathieu” will be unavailable on the event date, the Super Sci-Fi Book Sale will now take place in nearby “Salle René-Lévesque,” adjoining the hotel’s restaurant. To repeat, The Super Sci-Fi Book Sale has been moved to “Salle René-Lévesque,” at the downtown Nouvel Hotel, 1740 Boul. René-Lévesque O. (corner St-Mathieu, near downtown Metro stations and on major bus routes)! The entrance to the book sale is situated just to the left of the south “condo” tower’s main entrance, and is accessible directly from St-Mathieu Street, or from within the hotel complex. Please spread the word! And bring a couple friends to the sale!

Help us stage this event by volunteering to lend a hand with unpacking, set-up, and take-down! We require help especially on Friday evening, October 16, and Saturday morning, October 17, the day of the sale! Volunteer-club-members, and volunteers in general, are rewarded with first crack at our inventory of books, as well as with our eternal gratitude!

Contact MonSFFA at: president@monsffa.ca

JUST ONE WEEK LEFT UNTIL THE SUPER SCI-FI BOOK SALE!

Attention MonSFFA Club Members, and Sci-Fi Book Fans Across the Montreal Region!

MonSFFA’s annual Super Sci-Fi Book Sale will take place in just one week, next Saturday, October 17! Doors open to the public at 12:30PM! 

Be sure to mark next Saturday, October 17, in your calendars, folks, and gather your coins and folding money for this bargain-bonanza of a chance to stock up on all your fall and winter sci-fi reading! Come one, come all!

The Halloween season is upon us, and that’s the perfect time to revisit classic sci-fi/horror stories, or to start reading a new dark fantasy series! And remember, a good book makes a great present, so get an early jump on your Christmas gift shopping!

Paperbacks, hardcovers, trades, plus many comics, magazines, and even a few DVDs—we’ll have hundreds upon hundreds of titles, from Asimov to Zelazny, at the lowest prices in all of known space! Take advantage of our “Bulk Book Bargains”—the more you buy, the more you save!

PLEASE TAKE NOTE: We are informed by our venue managers of a last-minute change of function room! Because our originally advertised “Salle St-Mathieu” will be unavailable on the event date, the Super Sci-Fi Book Sale will now take place in nearby “Salle René-Lévesque,” adjoining the hotel’s restaurant. To repeat, The Super Sci-Fi Book Sale has been moved to “Salle René-Lévesque,” at the downtown Nouvel Hotel, 1740 Boul. René-Lévesque O. (corner St-Mathieu, near downtown Metro stations and on major bus routes)! The entrance to the book sale is situated just to the left of the south “condo” tower’s main entrance, and is accessible directly from St-Mathieu Street, or from within the hotel complex. Please spread the word! And bring a couple friends to the sale!

Help us stage this event by volunteering to lend a hand with unpacking, set-up, and take-down! We require help especially on Friday evening, October 16, and Saturday morning, October 17, the day of the sale! Volunteer-club-members, and volunteers in general, are rewarded with first crack at our inventory of books, as well as with our eternal gratitude!

Contact MonSFFA at: president@monsffa.ca

Montreal Science Fiction and Fantasy Association