{"id":4215,"date":"2017-01-15T06:00:00","date_gmt":"2017-01-15T11:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.monsffa.ca\/?p=4215"},"modified":"2017-01-14T16:47:27","modified_gmt":"2017-01-14T21:47:27","slug":"sightings-of-ufo-course-at-mcgill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.monsffa.ca\/?p=4215","title":{"rendered":"SIGHTINGS OF UFO COURSE AT MCGILL"},"content":{"rendered":"

MARIE-FRANCE COALLIER\u00a0<\/em><\/span>\u00a0 Montreal Gazette<\/em><\/span><\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n
Don Donderi, at his home office on Friday, teaches a class on the UFO world.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/a><\/span>Q: How did teaching this course come about?<\/p>\n

A: Well, I\u2019ve been interested in the topic since I was 10 years old. I was certainly literate at 10 and I was following what was going in the papers and magazines in the United States, where I grew up.<\/p>\n

And in 1947, there were (UFO) sightings. There was a famous sighting by a guy named Kenneth Arnold who was a private pilot who flew up in the Cascade (mountain range in Washington) and he saw and reported nine silvery objects flying over the mountains. He was very articulate in his report . … The story got into AP (Associated Press) the next day in June of 1947. And the AP headline writer coined the phrase \u2018flying saucers\u2019, which is where it all began.<\/p>\n

Q: Wasn\u2019t that the same year as the famous Roswell UFO incident in New Mexico?<\/p>\n

A: It\u2019s the same year actually, just a few weeks later. The whole Roswell thing came just after the Kenneth Arnold sighting in 1947.<\/p>\n

Q: What\u2019s your take on what happened at Roswell?<\/p>\n

A: The U.S. government recovered the remains of a crashed unidentified flying object or to be more correct, an extraterrestrial vehicle.<\/p>\n

Q: Do you believe aliens were found at the crash site?<\/p>\n

A: It is believed that they also recovered bodies of dead aliens.<\/p>\n

Q: Why so much silence and secrecy for all these years?<\/p>\n

A: Well, that\u2019s a very good question, and I raise it in my course … The technology involved is extremely advanced; the implications for human society are incredible and possibly upsetting because we are under surveillance by technologically superior beings from other planets. We don\u2019t know how to do what they do. We don\u2019t know what their motives are or their interests are. And at the moment, as far as I know, we don\u2019t have any active defences or preparations to deal with the situation. So it\u2019s obviously upsetting. Secrecy is because when governments, any government, gets hold of new technology, and want to figure out how it works, their first interest is protecting their own turf on this and not sharing it with the world.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Erectile dysfunction comes with this prescription free cialis click that page<\/a> unpleasantness for men. Prostatic calculus is one of the most common diseases in recent days and this is mainly happening due to heavy work pressure cheap cialis brand<\/a> and constant working in front of computers. Fortunately, medical science has taken a pfizer viagra mastercard<\/a> giant leap forward in curing this nightmare called ED. The medicine that was being made for one purpose and its unintended side effect being a pleasant experience. amerikabulteni.com<\/a> discount online viagra <\/span><\/p>\n

\n

Q: How certain are you of life beyond our planet?<\/p>\n

A: I\u2019m 100 per cent certain of that. The way I put it in my course and to the public is this: I have three main propositions. One, some of what people report as UFOs are extraterrestrial vehicles. That proposition, I believe, is established beyond reasonable doubt. And if you know your law, you\u2019ll know that\u2019s the standard for a conviction of a felony. Proposition 2 is that some of the extraterrestrial vehicles have ET crews, and proposition 3 is that some of these ET crews \u2018catch and release\u2019 humans to study them, so-called alien abductions. Proposition 2, I think, is established beyond a reasonable doubt, and proposition 3 is bound on probabilities.<\/p>\n

Q: Do you personally know anyone who was abducted by aliens?<\/p>\n

A: I know many people. I\u2019d say 10, at least, who have claimed to be abducted. And in many cases, I respect their claims because I think they\u2019re based on sound evidence.<\/p>\n

Q: There are doubters, of course. How do you handle skepticism?<\/p>\n

A: Listen, skepticism is absolutely OK. If you pick up my book (UFOs, ETs and alien abductions: A scientist looks at the evidence, 2013) which you probably won\u2019t do, you\u2019ll find I have a great deal of respect for skeptics who are doing their best to make sure what they know and what the world knows is based on reasonable sound evidence. That\u2019s good. I\u2019m a scientist.<\/p>\n

Q: With the proliferation of drones, wouldn\u2019t it be easy to fly one above Mount Royal and say, \u2018Hey, look up, it\u2019s a UFO!\u201d<\/p>\n

A: Exactly. One of my better friends, who is a drone user commercially \u2014 takes real estate photos for people \u2014 he and I and everyone else in the field knows it\u2019s perfectly possible to fake UFO photographs and experiences.<\/p>\n

Q: Have you ever seen a UFO yourself ?<\/p>\n

A: Only the kind that wouldn\u2019t impress anyone as sound evidence because nocturnal lights, which is a technical term, are a dime a dozen and you couldn\u2019t be sure at a distance what it was.<\/p>\n

Q: What are the chances of a UFO landing on Ste-Catherine St. and an alien climbing out to shake my hand?<\/p>\n

A: (Laughing) Ah yes, the famous White House lawn landing. I have no idea; I can\u2019t possibly tell you on the basis of anything I\u2019ve learned on the subject. Except that … whoever shows up will go away and not come back here for a while.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n