MARIE-FRANCE COALLIER Montreal Gazette
Q: How did teaching this course come about?
A: Well, I’ve been interested in the topic since I was 10 years old. I was certainly literate at 10 and I was following what was going in the papers and magazines in the United States, where I grew up.
And in 1947, there were (UFO) sightings. There was a famous sighting by a guy named Kenneth Arnold who was a private pilot who flew up in the Cascade (mountain range in Washington) and he saw and reported nine silvery objects flying over the mountains. He was very articulate in his report . … The story got into AP (Associated Press) the next day in June of 1947. And the AP headline writer coined the phrase ‘flying saucers’, which is where it all began.
Q: Wasn’t that the same year as the famous Roswell UFO incident in New Mexico?
A: It’s the same year actually, just a few weeks later. The whole Roswell thing came just after the Kenneth Arnold sighting in 1947.
Q: What’s your take on what happened at Roswell?
A: The U.S. government recovered the remains of a crashed unidentified flying object or to be more correct, an extraterrestrial vehicle.
Q: Do you believe aliens were found at the crash site?
A: It is believed that they also recovered bodies of dead aliens.
Q: Why so much silence and secrecy for all these years?
A: Well, that’s a very good question, and I raise it in my course … The technology involved is extremely advanced; the implications for human society are incredible and possibly upsetting because we are under surveillance by technologically superior beings from other planets. We don’t know how to do what they do. We don’t know what their motives are or their interests are. And at the moment, as far as I know, we don’t have any active defences or preparations to deal with the situation. So it’s obviously upsetting. Secrecy is because when governments, any government, gets hold of new technology, and want to figure out how it works, their first interest is protecting their own turf on this and not sharing it with the world.
Erectile dysfunction comes with this prescription free cialis click that page unpleasantness for men. Prostatic calculus is one of the most common diseases in recent days and this is mainly happening due to heavy work pressure cheap cialis brand and constant working in front of computers. Fortunately, medical science has taken a pfizer viagra mastercard giant leap forward in curing this nightmare called ED. The medicine that was being made for one purpose and its unintended side effect being a pleasant experience. amerikabulteni.com discount online viagra
Q: How certain are you of life beyond our planet?
A: I’m 100 per cent certain of that. The way I put it in my course and to the public is this: I have three main propositions. One, some of what people report as UFOs are extraterrestrial vehicles. That proposition, I believe, is established beyond reasonable doubt. And if you know your law, you’ll know that’s the standard for a conviction of a felony. Proposition 2 is that some of the extraterrestrial vehicles have ET crews, and proposition 3 is that some of these ET crews ‘catch and release’ humans to study them, so-called alien abductions. Proposition 2, I think, is established beyond a reasonable doubt, and proposition 3 is bound on probabilities.
Q: Do you personally know anyone who was abducted by aliens?
A: I know many people. I’d say 10, at least, who have claimed to be abducted. And in many cases, I respect their claims because I think they’re based on sound evidence.
Q: There are doubters, of course. How do you handle skepticism?
A: Listen, skepticism is absolutely OK. If you pick up my book (UFOs, ETs and alien abductions: A scientist looks at the evidence, 2013) which you probably won’t do, you’ll find I have a great deal of respect for skeptics who are doing their best to make sure what they know and what the world knows is based on reasonable sound evidence. That’s good. I’m a scientist.
Q: With the proliferation of drones, wouldn’t it be easy to fly one above Mount Royal and say, ‘Hey, look up, it’s a UFO!”
A: Exactly. One of my better friends, who is a drone user commercially — takes real estate photos for people — he and I and everyone else in the field knows it’s perfectly possible to fake UFO photographs and experiences.
Q: Have you ever seen a UFO yourself ?
A: Only the kind that wouldn’t impress anyone as sound evidence because nocturnal lights, which is a technical term, are a dime a dozen and you couldn’t be sure at a distance what it was.
Q: What are the chances of a UFO landing on Ste-Catherine St. and an alien climbing out to shake my hand?
A: (Laughing) Ah yes, the famous White House lawn landing. I have no idea; I can’t possibly tell you on the basis of anything I’ve learned on the subject. Except that … whoever shows up will go away and not come back here for a while.
He’s not being paid for the course at MCLL McGill.
Oh, how odd, but I did wonder at McGill offering a UFO course. So he must be in fact offering a private course, renting a room from McGill? Do you still have contact with him? Let’s take this to regular email.
While I strongly believe there is life, probably not as we know it, somewhere among the billions of planets and universes that exists, have they been to earth – perhaps yes, perhaps no.
Out of curiosity last winter I took the course by Don Donderi. He did raise many interesting facts and I had the opportunity to listen to others claiming to have seen UFOs. Should they be dismissed? No! Many things we once thought impossible have occurred and Donderi has certainly thoroughly researched his facts and presented them in a valid, serious manner.
However, we need to question very carefully. I raised several points, which Donderi immediately dismissed, sometimes in a rather scoffing manner.
First of all, if ETs are visiting us, why only for nefarious reasons? Donderi firmly believes in UFOs, but could not accept the possibility some may be good. Is it the human perception that always suspects something or someone different to be bad? And because of this could his reasoning be bias when researching alien abductions?
We are all fully aware that researchers tranquillize and study our earthly wildlife. Those who claim to have been abducted, could this have been in the back of their minds. Could this fact have been remembered due to some mind affecting occurrence – other than an alien abduction. The human mind works in strange ways, and it is not unknown for someone to think something has happened, or is, when in fact that is not the case.
And if they had been ‘abducted’? Could they not have gone willingly, to explore the great beyond. If that was the case, could their human mind not being able to grasp the truth, instead put their own ‘known’ and ‘comfortable’ interpretation to the event.
Another fact that stood out. If aliens are able to visit us, they must have very advanced technology. Why then, were those claiming to have been abducted, saying the aliens were using examination procedures common for our time frame, but would be very primitive for advanced aliens.
That being said, having attended the course I strongly feel we should pay attention to what Donderi says. He raised many interesting and disturbing facts. However, I cannot accept only one side of the coin. Aliens could be bad or good. Personally, I would like to shake the hand of some visiting ET and be the person to make “first contact”.
You raise interesting points in your comments! I sense a WARP article in your future! 🙂
Why not ask Don to be a guest speaker at MonSFFA. He is really a very nice and friendly person.
He gives his class on Mondays, I’m there taking literature courses, if you want I could introduce you. It’s beside the McCord Museum, (McGill Metro).
I doubt he would come unless we offered an honorarium, and we can’t afford it.